Dreamcatcher

Physical implants break down into two categories: inert implants and biological implants. An inert or purely physical implant is a piece of metal, crystal, silicon chip or other substance which is inserted into the body. These are designed to transmit right into the subject’s nervous system. I recently found out that many of these implants are biological. When a subject for biological implanting is picked up, a sample of their cell structure is taken.

The abductors then do some genetic engineering on the DNA and cell structure, culture it and grow a transceiver out of the biological matter. This sounds more than a bit avant garde, hut there is no scientific research which indicates that a biological material cannot be configured to manufacture a radio transceiver. Where a normal transceiver would have wires, a biological version uses bionic cell structures that replicate the wire and other circuitry.

One implant has been discovered that is typically inserted in the body just above the gonads in the male. I’m not sure exactly where it would sit in the female. The implant is designed to transmit when the subject becomes sexually excited. If the subject is not excited then no transmission will occur.

Although these implants are often connected to sexuality, it is not always the case. I found one instance where this type of implant was also connected to the optical center of the brain. In other words, as I waved my hand in front of one guy’s eyes and face, the transmission of the implant changed.

A bizarre and graphic example of a biological implant came to light when a fellow from Brooklyn visited me and wanted to be scanned for implants. At that particular time, I was using spectrum analyzers, grid dip oscillators (this is a device which looks for resonant networks) and other equipment in order to find implants with radio circuitry in them. As I moved an RF (radio frequency) probe over his body, I noticed a signal appeared when I brought it close to his abdomen. If I took the probe away from his abdomen, the signal went down and almost disappeared on the spectrum analyzer. Of course, anyone who works with electronics knows spectrum analyzers aren’t that accurate, so I had to “zero beat” the signal. 1 his means that I put the signal into an analyzer so that it could he matched up with the signal being transmitted through this guy’s body and identified. I wanted to find out the actual carrier frequency that the implant was on and I did. Lo and behold: it was the same as Channel 25 in Brooklyn!

This was a rather amazing discovery and was rather unbelievable. I then converted the signal so that it could be read out on a television monitor. Sure enough, it was the same Channel 25 and I could see it on the screen. This guy was actually intercepting Channel 25 from Brooklyn and rebroadcasting it. His implant was on the same exact frequency, but there was also a bizarre technical oddity at work. This implant transceiver was acting in the manner of what is known as a simplex repeater. This is a device which has a receiver that receives the signal. There is then a delay after which the signal is transmitted. It is called a repeater hecause it repeats the signal. The man’s implant was perplexing because the receiver and transmitter were on at the same time. This may not sound like anything unusual to the average reader, but as an electronics expert I was amazed. I had never seen such a device nor do I know how to construct one.

to be continue